Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-10 09:41:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A37AD8E9035A84475AC924BD874B58E5F1674B4A3FACDAB31E0643487858FDEE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le post est trompeur, dans le sens où il ne s'agit bien évidemment pas des dommages-intérêts que récupéreront les ayant-droits de la victime, qui sont généralement bien plus élevés, mais d'une amende pénale, pouvant aller jusqu'à 100 000€ d'amende dans ce cas. https://justice.pagesjaunes.fr/astuce/voir/548489/audience-sur-les-interets-civils

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1844001540001984977
participantId -
raterParticipantId - A37AD8E9035A84475AC924BD874B58E5F1674B4A3FACDAB31E0643487858FDEE
createdAtMillis - 1728553287597
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1844001540001984977A37AD8E9035A84475AC924BD874B58E5F1674B4A3FACDAB31E0643487858FDEE