Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-09 19:00:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9CE7F627C7BD451A42D02AE84D9AB64FE5ED92D6A4310469B09D4933224209B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

From the paper: "there is a potential for ascertainment bias if diagnostic thresholds were lower in vaccinated than unvaccinated individuals." Results based on findings of 15 events in total, of a condition which rcould be overlooked in the other group. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.20.24306810v1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1843857818832486831
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9CE7F627C7BD451A42D02AE84D9AB64FE5ED92D6A4310469B09D4933224209B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1728500419464
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18438578188324868319CE7F627C7BD451A42D02AE84D9AB64FE5ED92D6A4310469B09D4933224209B9