Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-09 11:02:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1BA83A61BC054A544A5C428972BAA840A5267A61C3BB356273FDC0B24431500D
Participant Details

Original Note:

From the paper: "there is a potential for ascertainment bias if diagnostic thresholds were lower in vaccinated than unvaccinated individuals." Results based on findings of 15 events in total, of a condition which rcould be overlooked in the other group. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.20.24306810v1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1843857818832486831
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1BA83A61BC054A544A5C428972BAA840A5267A61C3BB356273FDC0B24431500D
  • createdAtMillis - 1728471737691
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18438578188324868311BA83A61BC054A544A5C428972BAA840A5267A61C3BB356273FDC0B24431500D