Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-10 14:04:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN No note needed. The interpretation of these results or results from other studies can be argued in comments. The author simply notes a conclusion found in the study as notable, highlights it, and it is in fact notable by being a total binary result. No opinion is shared.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1843831327067373979
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1728569044450
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1843831327067373979F84822F502E92F069659B7E05DBE49E5DF05899B154FF6E9E3455E102EBAC6CE