Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-09 13:02:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9D3ED2FCB075FF63D8042B1356E9AE9F29EB07D0F5CE3B69CEA2224DA2F174CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN No note needed. The interpretation of these results or results from other studies can be argued in comments. The author simply notes a conclusion found in the study as notable, highlights it, and it is in fact notable by being a total binary result. No opinion is shared.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1843831327067373979
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9D3ED2FCB075FF63D8042B1356E9AE9F29EB07D0F5CE3B69CEA2224DA2F174CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1728478922541
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18438313270673739799D3ED2FCB075FF63D8042B1356E9AE9F29EB07D0F5CE3B69CEA2224DA2F174CE