Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-09 14:46:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C0771FA3883EBD9F20F4FDAC443FE4CE50A79A0B25221403C75A9F81C845B4F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN No note needed. The interpretation of these results or results from other studies can be argued in comments. The author simply notes a conclusion found in the study as notable, highlights it, and it is in fact notable by being a total binary result. No opinion is shared.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1843831327067373979
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C0771FA3883EBD9F20F4FDAC443FE4CE50A79A0B25221403C75A9F81C845B4F
  • createdAtMillis - 1728485206006
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18438313270673739790C0771FA3883EBD9F20F4FDAC443FE4CE50A79A0B25221403C75A9F81C845B4F