Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-10 01:15:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5479051A805F6DC78E5AEA347619D7EB498D7E67DDC153AF7157A6DDBD876493
Participant Details

Original Note:

Im Unterschied zu ihren Kritikern setzt Shurjoka ihre Zuschauer aktiv dazu ein, um andere Influencer*innen zu behelligen. https://youtube.com/shorts/BeWmq5VGmn4?si=Ug6tT5lqup3l6mqL Rufschädigende Äußerungen wurden nicht nur von der "toxischen Bubble" festgestellt, sondern auch von Gerichten. https://x.com/TobiasHuch/status/1819373732168605758

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1843790847604650174
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5479051A805F6DC78E5AEA347619D7EB498D7E67DDC153AF7157A6DDBD876493
  • createdAtMillis - 1728522911134
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18437908476046501745479051A805F6DC78E5AEA347619D7EB498D7E67DDC153AF7157A6DDBD876493