Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-09 16:56:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E1A4C2FC86BCC33698B248D9F7A3129DCDDEC5E5A40F08C843B13F8C66D06773
Participant Details

Original Note:

元ポストの指摘は正確ではありませんが、一方で、自民党改憲草案は現行の西欧の天賦人権説に基づくと考えられる人権規定から、「我が国の歴史、文化、伝統を踏まえた」人権規定とする考えを示しており、現行憲法と同様であるというノートの指摘も正しくありません。 https://storage2.jimin.jp/pdf/pamphlet/kenpou_qa.pdf (Q14、Q44参照)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1843781313528234293
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E1A4C2FC86BCC33698B248D9F7A3129DCDDEC5E5A40F08C843B13F8C66D06773
  • createdAtMillis - 1728493007356
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1843781313528234293E1A4C2FC86BCC33698B248D9F7A3129DCDDEC5E5A40F08C843B13F8C66D06773