Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-10 07:23:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00819BDCAA385D10049D512029D3F839808A094BFB9F6FC322E9BF9087A6D4D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Aus Furcht vor hohen Strafen* werden Plattformbetreiber im Zweifel gemeldete Posts löschen. Würden staatliche Stellen direkt die Aufgaben wahrnehmen, welche das DSA auf verschiedene Akteure überträgt, müßte man von verfassungswidriger Zensur sprechen (Artikel 5 Abs. 1 GG). * https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/dsa-enforcement

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1843731321023062115
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 00819BDCAA385D10049D512029D3F839808A094BFB9F6FC322E9BF9087A6D4D9
createdAtMillis - 1728545031244
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 184373132102306211500819BDCAA385D10049D512029D3F839808A094BFB9F6FC322E9BF9087A6D4D9