Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-08 09:06:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 46C483D47A27F92227B3EB662655AEF1A7893EF0FA1861C51DD204AC45EA901A
Participant Details

Original Note:

これは論文ではなく単なるツイートです。 「学術論文」とは、「査読付き学術雑誌に掲載された原著論文」と定義されるのが一般的です。 https://www.u-toyama.ac.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/definition.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1843425515874750940
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 46C483D47A27F92227B3EB662655AEF1A7893EF0FA1861C51DD204AC45EA901A
  • createdAtMillis - 1728378397214
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184342551587475094046C483D47A27F92227B3EB662655AEF1A7893EF0FA1861C51DD204AC45EA901A