Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-09 19:37:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E5ABB1F77FD12770EAF9F2241442A549F6F30B841EDAB28010EC3282FFA7E9AC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Written evidence for the existence of Jesus is not the same as archaeological evidence. The OP is correct there is no archaeological evidence for the existence of Jesus. NNN Silberman, N. A., & Goren, Y. (2003). Faking Biblical History. Archaeology, 56(5), 20–29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41658744

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1843316494509232592
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E5ABB1F77FD12770EAF9F2241442A549F6F30B841EDAB28010EC3282FFA7E9AC
  • createdAtMillis - 1728502627584
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1843316494509232592E5ABB1F77FD12770EAF9F2241442A549F6F30B841EDAB28010EC3282FFA7E9AC