Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-28 00:04:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F0855CCD61128429B281E50F745F72ADAEFB732C0DADB4FF8F4F2EC9B6ECB07
Participant Details

Original Note:

Written evidence for the existence of Jesus is not the same as archaeological evidence. The OP is correct there is no archaeological evidence for the existence of Jesus. NNN Silberman, N. A., & Goren, Y. (2003). Faking Biblical History. Archaeology, 56(5), 20–29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41658744

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1843316494509232592
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F0855CCD61128429B281E50F745F72ADAEFB732C0DADB4FF8F4F2EC9B6ECB07
  • createdAtMillis - 1730073853308
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18433164945092325920F0855CCD61128429B281E50F745F72ADAEFB732C0DADB4FF8F4F2EC9B6ECB07