Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-07 22:39:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DE66E4120DA09A101328409E18B6DC3DB338213C89BAB618D82854E1419E1A9F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Post is correct and refers to control of media companies. CN is irrelevant to post, because it claims non-existences of individual journalists' bias. Furthermore, the provided study is about hypothetical scenarios and email response rates, not about actual publications. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7112764/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1843312913941168537
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DE66E4120DA09A101328409E18B6DC3DB338213C89BAB618D82854E1419E1A9F
  • createdAtMillis - 1728340787391
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1843312913941168537DE66E4120DA09A101328409E18B6DC3DB338213C89BAB618D82854E1419E1A9F