Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-06 23:54:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B8349D89DC5A9C1829A5FAC6C1E965D85E1C2495BCF441EAA78EE2CA8FC0A26A
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no recorded instance of Suzi mocking or even broadly disrespecting anyone or anything mentioned. The wording of this user’s reply strongly indicates they neither believe in the concept of nuance nor opinions changing over time, a consequence of their own hypocrisy. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hypocrisy

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842999034698772915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B8349D89DC5A9C1829A5FAC6C1E965D85E1C2495BCF441EAA78EE2CA8FC0A26A
  • createdAtMillis - 1728258889824
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1842999034698772915B8349D89DC5A9C1829A5FAC6C1E965D85E1C2495BCF441EAA78EE2CA8FC0A26A