Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-07 02:33:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AA203182B8EF88C13F84D84630AABD0CAF9C0BF16110AEA6DEC2F34128CA5FB4
Participant Details

Original Note:

i believe lucky garden ducks note would be good if they removed the first part, as its also speculation. absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. just note the fact that there is no reliable source claiming it was a gas explosion if that is the case. google.com

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842949467269746937
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AA203182B8EF88C13F84D84630AABD0CAF9C0BF16110AEA6DEC2F34128CA5FB4
  • createdAtMillis - 1728268421351
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1842949467269746937AA203182B8EF88C13F84D84630AABD0CAF9C0BF16110AEA6DEC2F34128CA5FB4