Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-08 07:53:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35925F355B2D2E8819E1D5D480FD8C575C41642473BDBC9607AC44131247C7E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

いわゆる「騒音おばさんの真実」と言われる説は、ソースが2ch（当時）の書き込みであり根拠がなく、デマといって差し支えないものです。 https://dic.nicovideo.jp/a/%E9%A8%92%E9%9F%B3%E3%81%8A%E3%81%B0%E3%81%95%E3%82%93%E3%81%AE%E7%9C%9F%E5%AE%9F 判決文でも、そのような事情は認定されていません。 （第一審） https://www.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_jp/365/007365_hanrei.pdf （上告審） https://www.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_jp/079/050079_hanrei.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842893819416822165
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35925F355B2D2E8819E1D5D480FD8C575C41642473BDBC9607AC44131247C7E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1728373998514
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184289381941682216535925F355B2D2E8819E1D5D480FD8C575C41642473BDBC9607AC44131247C7E5