Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-06 12:14:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 20F877E0B7E6D5E18FDE06CACA44CF0075C2D1639DB413EDE383E42915030D2A
Participant Details

Original Note:

個人的な意見の表明でありノートは不要です。 画像の新聞記事が実在し(下記URL)、実際に外国人登用案が出ていた事実があり、それに対して「絶対にダメだ」という意見を述べることのどこにも誤解を招く要素はありません。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20230509-URHHFHHIHBLAZATECSJWFMHF2Q/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842867528483353001
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 20F877E0B7E6D5E18FDE06CACA44CF0075C2D1639DB413EDE383E42915030D2A
  • createdAtMillis - 1728216848211
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184286752848335300120F877E0B7E6D5E18FDE06CACA44CF0075C2D1639DB413EDE383E42915030D2A