Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-06 18:23:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF56F285D044759F338D4A6B94FD3DCEC5E889F40B90152E6F702071EE037CA0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not necessarily NNN, but proposed note (and especially its cited video of a gas station explosion in china being bigger) is pure speculation. A number of factors could impact explosion radius and height, including if it hadn't been as full or was smaller.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842865788950134972
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF56F285D044759F338D4A6B94FD3DCEC5E889F40B90152E6F702071EE037CA0
  • createdAtMillis - 1728238983908
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1842865788950134972AF56F285D044759F338D4A6B94FD3DCEC5E889F40B90152E6F702071EE037CA0