Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-06 08:43:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E86F2CABCEF25CCFDABA6F2F2FFA50522B1B54176A0CC1F7734A294C4019EA06
Participant Details

Original Note:

What matters is that a major publication considered the article to be valid and published it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842771716160008338
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E86F2CABCEF25CCFDABA6F2F2FFA50522B1B54176A0CC1F7734A294C4019EA06
  • createdAtMillis - 1728204211125
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1842771716160008338E86F2CABCEF25CCFDABA6F2F2FFA50522B1B54176A0CC1F7734A294C4019EA06