Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-05 23:09:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EA7AD4046C052A60F00C8981F1CDDB80FC52E534D0646332E159DEB05714428F
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is a fallacy to claim that individuals in X leadership having personal bias is evidence of the platform's bias. In the past, there was intentional/gov't influenced partisan bias with Twitter's algorithm and content moderation. The algorithm is now open source. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fallacy%20of%20composition https://x.com/mtaibbi/status/1598822959866683394 https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842663264360223192
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EA7AD4046C052A60F00C8981F1CDDB80FC52E534D0646332E159DEB05714428F
  • createdAtMillis - 1728169764256
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1842663264360223192EA7AD4046C052A60F00C8981F1CDDB80FC52E534D0646332E159DEB05714428F