Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-06 08:58:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2791FD83BB8DF197E818BE8DD3AED2C8C2143C0FA8B72F07E8678DFBABF59292
Participant Details

Original Note:

The paper they cite evaluated whether news was misleading by using a politically balanced group of laypeople as raters, according to one of the paper’s authors: https://x.com/dg_rand/status/1842624884100186538

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842651788203463117
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2791FD83BB8DF197E818BE8DD3AED2C8C2143C0FA8B72F07E8678DFBABF59292
  • createdAtMillis - 1728205113020
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18426517882034631172791FD83BB8DF197E818BE8DD3AED2C8C2143C0FA8B72F07E8678DFBABF59292