Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-05 16:59:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED90F8FBF4A3F647CAE24179DCFD4B3ED1624CF5C04CDCE3C1A543FE580A6BD2
Participant Details

Original Note:

レプリコンワクチンの薬事承認にあたっては、動物試験や臨床試験の結果に基づいて安全性が審査され、既存のmRNAワクチンと比較し、安全性に大きな差異がないことが確認されています。 https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/vaccine_qa.html#21 シェディングなどというのは根拠が無いデマです。 https://www.meiji-seika-pharma.co.jp/meiji-rep/for-public/common/KOSTAIVE_QA.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842542730599448576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED90F8FBF4A3F647CAE24179DCFD4B3ED1624CF5C04CDCE3C1A543FE580A6BD2
  • createdAtMillis - 1728147584252
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1842542730599448576ED90F8FBF4A3F647CAE24179DCFD4B3ED1624CF5C04CDCE3C1A543FE580A6BD2