Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-05 22:41:25 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4184540A1EFDD04F5DD5BD7C05169596EBC2F446966382C4D0427AB7DD2E2329
Participant Details

Original Note:

引用元を見ればわかりますが、週刊文春や週刊現代でこの疑惑が報じられたのはそれぞれ2003年、2008年ですが、未だ証拠はなく、判明とは言えないことに注意してください。 コミュニティノートは誤解を招く可能性があるツイートに背景情報を提供します。 https://help.x.com/ja/using-x/community-notes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842419509816422843
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4184540A1EFDD04F5DD5BD7C05169596EBC2F446966382C4D0427AB7DD2E2329
  • createdAtMillis - 1728168085655
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18424195098164228434184540A1EFDD04F5DD5BD7C05169596EBC2F446966382C4D0427AB7DD2E2329