Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-05 09:28:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DDCCA087333D7CCE11764A7D5063C5B1270711D01DF04646768BE7CBFB5B7FE7
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.asahi.com/opinion/ 先に付されたCNにはオピニオン記事は新聞社の意見では無いと述べていますが、上記に示しました朝日新聞のオピニオン記事の内容を見れば分かるように、オピニオン記事のほとんどが新聞社の主張を補強したり新聞社の主張に読者を誘導する為の内容となっている事に留意して下さい。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842376996279697732
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DDCCA087333D7CCE11764A7D5063C5B1270711D01DF04646768BE7CBFB5B7FE7
  • createdAtMillis - 1728120482672
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1842376996279697732DDCCA087333D7CCE11764A7D5063C5B1270711D01DF04646768BE7CBFB5B7FE7