Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-05 03:33:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C51EC7F0FAA397567865FA8B8508CBE4A6EC324A068EF449F73E776FA5276A33
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.asahi.com/opinion/ 先に付されたCNにはオピニオン記事は新聞社の意見では無いと述べていますが、上記に示しました朝日新聞のオピニオン記事の内容を見れば分かるように、オピニオン記事のほとんどが新聞社の主張を補強したり新聞社の主張に読者を誘導する為の内容となっている事に留意して下さい。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842376996279697732
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C51EC7F0FAA397567865FA8B8508CBE4A6EC324A068EF449F73E776FA5276A33
  • createdAtMillis - 1728099219792
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1842376996279697732C51EC7F0FAA397567865FA8B8508CBE4A6EC324A068EF449F73E776FA5276A33