Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-05 06:42:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7F412AD14FDE0FB769E88BBA591130CF488561D872C225C5AE903C070F386C29
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.asahi.com/opinion/ 先に付されたCNにはオピニオン記事は新聞社の意見では無いと述べていますが、上記に示しました朝日新聞のオピニオン記事の内容を見れば分かるように、オピニオン記事のほとんどが新聞社の主張を補強したり新聞社の主張に読者を誘導する為の内容となっている事に留意して下さい。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842376996279697732
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7F412AD14FDE0FB769E88BBA591130CF488561D872C225C5AE903C070F386C29
  • createdAtMillis - 1728110577260
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18423769962796977327F412AD14FDE0FB769E88BBA591130CF488561D872C225C5AE903C070F386C29