Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-12 22:47:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 420578DBF9DF6480111BAE72C40BC98EB3D808954F5392E7B0CAB23B7D3CCDC0
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.asahi.com/opinion/ 先に付されたCNにはオピニオン記事は新聞社の意見では無いと述べていますが、上記に示しました朝日新聞のオピニオン記事の内容を見れば分かるように、オピニオン記事のほとんどが新聞社の主張を補強したり新聞社の主張に読者を誘導する為の内容となっている事に留意して下さい。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842376996279697732
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 420578DBF9DF6480111BAE72C40BC98EB3D808954F5392E7B0CAB23B7D3CCDC0
  • createdAtMillis - 1728773270412
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1842376996279697732420578DBF9DF6480111BAE72C40BC98EB3D808954F5392E7B0CAB23B7D3CCDC0