Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-06 02:55:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0E0D2871946375D731205BA3682F3760B889CEA19F8CFE73FE3901BDA57493C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Using a FEMA source with a vested interest in denying a potential scandal for the organization is unreliable at best. Verifiable information is lacking to support either claim currently but may change in the future as independent confirmation continues.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842364800640410089
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0E0D2871946375D731205BA3682F3760B889CEA19F8CFE73FE3901BDA57493C
  • createdAtMillis - 1728183311852
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1842364800640410089E0E0D2871946375D731205BA3682F3760B889CEA19F8CFE73FE3901BDA57493C