Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-05 04:52:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A8BB806B3B8458D0040B7FFB008C0A8BA3F77A3E26645CEFEF19FC63211337FA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Using a FEMA source with a vested interest in denying a potential scandal for the organization is unreliable at best. Verifiable information is lacking to support either claim currently but may change in the future as independent confirmation continues.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842364800640410089
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A8BB806B3B8458D0040B7FFB008C0A8BA3F77A3E26645CEFEF19FC63211337FA
  • createdAtMillis - 1728103937572
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1842364800640410089A8BB806B3B8458D0040B7FFB008C0A8BA3F77A3E26645CEFEF19FC63211337FA