Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-05 02:57:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1C2C26A049288EFCBF0E199F379BF25E231EB4DF21BC18480EF7182DB808E4DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Using a FEMA source with a vested interest in denying a potential scandal for the organization is unreliable at best. Verifiable information is lacking to support either claim currently but may change in the future as independent confirmation continues.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842364800640410089
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1C2C26A049288EFCBF0E199F379BF25E231EB4DF21BC18480EF7182DB808E4DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1728097051080
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18423648006404100891C2C26A049288EFCBF0E199F379BF25E231EB4DF21BC18480EF7182DB808E4DE