Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-05 06:13:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 01BA5B82982C26BFC760900E2AC4C97AE542A82FD2BBCAE8725FEA630627C87A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Using a FEMA source with a vested interest in denying a potential scandal for the organization is unreliable at best. Verifiable information is lacking to support either claim currently but may change in the future as independent confirmation continues.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842364800640410089
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 01BA5B82982C26BFC760900E2AC4C97AE542A82FD2BBCAE8725FEA630627C87A
  • createdAtMillis - 1728108788802
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184236480064041008901BA5B82982C26BFC760900E2AC4C97AE542A82FD2BBCAE8725FEA630627C87A