Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-09 05:10:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 12B218396F1E8313B8FCD6D3EB0674E7E1958725D61313D5491C907E3741B763
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post claims that the New York Times was “wall-to-wall hurricane coverage” after Katrina which the first image shows is true. The second image shows that the New York Times has moved on to other items in spite of the similar devistation by Hurricane Helene.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842339266694717727
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 12B218396F1E8313B8FCD6D3EB0674E7E1958725D61313D5491C907E3741B763
  • createdAtMillis - 1728450603677
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184233926669471772712B218396F1E8313B8FCD6D3EB0674E7E1958725D61313D5491C907E3741B763