Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-04 19:22:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2B802E86C035C8EF9B6FCC913B2D20EF5DF7C9316FD2B0EAFF3BC4B52EE001E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed CN begins "This post is misleading." There is nothing in the post that could be construed as misleading aside from the OP's opinions on the factually accurate statement regarding the conviction; in which case... NNN. Leave differences of opinion for the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842122464572412398
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F2B802E86C035C8EF9B6FCC913B2D20EF5DF7C9316FD2B0EAFF3BC4B52EE001E
  • createdAtMillis - 1728069724575
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1842122464572412398F2B802E86C035C8EF9B6FCC913B2D20EF5DF7C9316FD2B0EAFF3BC4B52EE001E