Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-04 16:59:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B35B93FB21EC34181A1D6E89A3E1EE4A6BFC2312EAF34B2CE27C2D9C1CC1F4A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed CN begins "This post is misleading." There is nothing in the post that could be construed as misleading aside from the OP's opinions on the factually accurate statement regarding the conviction; in which case... NNN. Leave differences of opinion for the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842122464572412398
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B35B93FB21EC34181A1D6E89A3E1EE4A6BFC2312EAF34B2CE27C2D9C1CC1F4A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1728061175074
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1842122464572412398B35B93FB21EC34181A1D6E89A3E1EE4A6BFC2312EAF34B2CE27C2D9C1CC1F4A5