Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-04 13:36:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 82E1983E9C994C6EC3960FB94BA5C269239FF669C8D4182995F7C9F4F80B03BD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed CN begins "This post is misleading." There is nothing in the post that could be construed as misleading aside from the OP's opinions on the factually accurate statement regarding the conviction; in which case... NNN. Leave differences of opinion for the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842122464572412398
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 82E1983E9C994C6EC3960FB94BA5C269239FF669C8D4182995F7C9F4F80B03BD
  • createdAtMillis - 1728048988194
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184212246457241239882E1983E9C994C6EC3960FB94BA5C269239FF669C8D4182995F7C9F4F80B03BD