Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-04 17:56:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4B7A2749C5A9FA1720503B5BD5B8D3AB2E77A17B5BEF8496A146E9D8A57F83D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed CN begins "This post is misleading." There is nothing in the post that could be construed as misleading aside from the OP's opinions on the factually accurate statement regarding the conviction; in which case... NNN. Leave differences of opinion for the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842122464572412398
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4B7A2749C5A9FA1720503B5BD5B8D3AB2E77A17B5BEF8496A146E9D8A57F83D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1728064598843
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18421224645724123984B7A2749C5A9FA1720503B5BD5B8D3AB2E77A17B5BEF8496A146E9D8A57F83D0