Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-04 18:12:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1767CF4E73C69F829CE9B8E0A7DA78497ACF2FF171BB2EB71374A369ACC2C3E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed CN begins "This post is misleading." There is nothing in the post that could be construed as misleading aside from the OP's opinions on the factually accurate statement regarding the conviction; in which case... NNN. Leave differences of opinion for the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842122464572412398
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1767CF4E73C69F829CE9B8E0A7DA78497ACF2FF171BB2EB71374A369ACC2C3E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1728065566778
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18421224645724123981767CF4E73C69F829CE9B8E0A7DA78497ACF2FF171BB2EB71374A369ACC2C3E4