Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-04 09:44:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4C652AED4A7E223CBA18B64EBCBBDBB0A15647F594D06DA7C8B629F1E3FFD43
Participant Details

Original Note:

Lucas Chancel fait ici une utilisation malhonnête d'une étude de l'Institut des politiques publiques. En effet, ce chiffre de 2% ne représente que le pourcentage d'IR payé sur le total du revenu économique, et ne prend pas en compte les autres types d'impôts payés. https://www.ipp.eu/publication/16253/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1842119673938092104
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C4C652AED4A7E223CBA18B64EBCBBDBB0A15647F594D06DA7C8B629F1E3FFD43
createdAtMillis - 1728035095979
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1842119673938092104C4C652AED4A7E223CBA18B64EBCBBDBB0A15647F594D06DA7C8B629F1E3FFD43