Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-05 16:17:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A74F7C57E87C7A6035C9DC80F7378B00E84AA928F5F42D838F0EC892C73726F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Lucas Chancel fait ici une utilisation malhonnête d'une étude de l'Institut des politiques publiques. En effet, ce chiffre de 2% ne représente que le pourcentage d'IR payé sur le total du revenu économique, et ne prend pas en compte les autres types d'impôts payés. https://www.ipp.eu/publication/16253/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1842119673938092104
participantId -
raterParticipantId - A74F7C57E87C7A6035C9DC80F7378B00E84AA928F5F42D838F0EC892C73726F1
createdAtMillis - 1728145025146
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1842119673938092104A74F7C57E87C7A6035C9DC80F7378B00E84AA928F5F42D838F0EC892C73726F1