Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-04 13:31:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 28BEE81021C17870C45A4CA9D53A108AC686651A6C244C62E52A76D8214BD56D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Lucas Chancel fait ici une utilisation malhonnête d'une étude de l'Institut des politiques publiques. En effet, ce chiffre de 2% ne représente que le pourcentage d'IR payé sur le total du revenu économique, et ne prend pas en compte les autres types d'impôts payés. https://www.ipp.eu/publication/16253/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1842119673938092104
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 28BEE81021C17870C45A4CA9D53A108AC686651A6C244C62E52A76D8214BD56D
createdAtMillis - 1728048663071
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 184211967393809210428BEE81021C17870C45A4CA9D53A108AC686651A6C244C62E52A76D8214BD56D