Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-04 12:03:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 963ED82074476AA28E8BA0FEADF3E1F38FD4DCB96B0A5F858AC02BE4BC14BEFF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. I agree, it's fair to criticise the contents of the post, and I agree that it is fair to point out that bias or even corruption may be involved here. But that's for your reply, it's not a community notes thing.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842117873063305229
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 963ED82074476AA28E8BA0FEADF3E1F38FD4DCB96B0A5F858AC02BE4BC14BEFF
  • createdAtMillis - 1728043411083
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1842117873063305229963ED82074476AA28E8BA0FEADF3E1F38FD4DCB96B0A5F858AC02BE4BC14BEFF