Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-04 17:55:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4B7A2749C5A9FA1720503B5BD5B8D3AB2E77A17B5BEF8496A146E9D8A57F83D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP does not claim that the data was erased. The CN cannot prove that the election worker was not ordered to remove data; it is one person's word against another. There is no correction needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842049630319624289
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4B7A2749C5A9FA1720503B5BD5B8D3AB2E77A17B5BEF8496A146E9D8A57F83D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1728064551031
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18420496303196242894B7A2749C5A9FA1720503B5BD5B8D3AB2E77A17B5BEF8496A146E9D8A57F83D0