Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-23 12:41:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F92F5C73C3F761DE17B8F29309C17FEF3AF2D98A39378798E3B61CEA35E040EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most cases dismissed were due to "standing". Evidence was not even considered. introduced. Pre-election, judges said, "can't prove what hasn't happened". Post-election, they said "should have filed before election". Catch22 way to weasle out of making a decision. https://hereistheevidence.com/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841869011526811791
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F92F5C73C3F761DE17B8F29309C17FEF3AF2D98A39378798E3B61CEA35E040EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1729687280670
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1841869011526811791F92F5C73C3F761DE17B8F29309C17FEF3AF2D98A39378798E3B61CEA35E040EE