Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-12 15:12:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BD3956A973D021871696F2F0EBF7C642745653F3DF4EEA3F1A731DBD1AEA799B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most cases dismissed were due to "standing". Evidence was not even considered. introduced. Pre-election, judges said, "can't prove what hasn't happened". Post-election, they said "should have filed before election". Catch22 way to weasle out of making a decision. https://hereistheevidence.com/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841869011526811791
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BD3956A973D021871696F2F0EBF7C642745653F3DF4EEA3F1A731DBD1AEA799B
  • createdAtMillis - 1728745967034
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1841869011526811791BD3956A973D021871696F2F0EBF7C642745653F3DF4EEA3F1A731DBD1AEA799B