Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-04 13:59:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0260C4D78A74F5E2623A8C42D2CAE8BD526537FDA6344B53E208B08E077555B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrairement à ce qu'indique le tweet, le risque d'inondation et la hausse du niveau de l'océan liés au changement climatique ont été pris en compte dans les études de dimensionnement et d'altimétrie de construction des réacteurs. Source (pages 74 et 75) : https://www.debatpublic.fr/sites/default/files/2024-08/EPR2-GRAVELINES-DMO.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1841868524110938530
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C0260C4D78A74F5E2623A8C42D2CAE8BD526537FDA6344B53E208B08E077555B
createdAtMillis - 1728050380102
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1841868524110938530C0260C4D78A74F5E2623A8C42D2CAE8BD526537FDA6344B53E208B08E077555B