Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-03 16:36:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5150F95FCA3C66F0AFE876CA0F904E06A2A3A9FBD815A7A4CEA2B0AC48C42F81
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrairement à ce qu'indique le tweet, le risque d'inondation et la hausse du niveau de l'océan liés au changement climatique ont été pris en compte dans les études de dimensionnement et d'altimétrie de construction des réacteurs. Source (pages 74 et 75) : https://www.debatpublic.fr/sites/default/files/2024-08/EPR2-GRAVELINES-DMO.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1841868524110938530
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5150F95FCA3C66F0AFE876CA0F904E06A2A3A9FBD815A7A4CEA2B0AC48C42F81
createdAtMillis - 1727973375280
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18418685241109385305150F95FCA3C66F0AFE876CA0F904E06A2A3A9FBD815A7A4CEA2B0AC48C42F81