Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-04 05:16:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5AD8D30DFDDA3468567D9026A25692EA7C6FD8A53AFF9CFFFD5ECB35820D790D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die beiden Autoren haben den Artikel von Dr. Ute Krüger scheinbar nicht gelesen. Frau Dr. Ute Krüger kann ihre Ausführungen sehr gut belegen. Nur eine groß angelegte wissenschaftliche Untersuchung kann ihre These widerlegen wozu Faktenchecker nicht qualifiziert sind.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841837503851966814
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5AD8D30DFDDA3468567D9026A25692EA7C6FD8A53AFF9CFFFD5ECB35820D790D
  • createdAtMillis - 1728018997638
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18418375038519668145AD8D30DFDDA3468567D9026A25692EA7C6FD8A53AFF9CFFFD5ECB35820D790D