Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-03 15:04:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8C120F8B617DBAC9E4696DE6F24E78952C3CAB0AAA8B11A719AE451FCC3B40DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

引用されている文書とは真逆の内容を捏造したポストです。 第三段落の6行目に「優先すべき医療行為の例として、帝王切開術や無痛分娩が挙げられているところです」と記載されており、無痛分娩を制限する内容ではありません。 https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/001283124.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841832735448695088
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8C120F8B617DBAC9E4696DE6F24E78952C3CAB0AAA8B11A719AE451FCC3B40DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1727967876623
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18418327354486950888C120F8B617DBAC9E4696DE6F24E78952C3CAB0AAA8B11A719AE451FCC3B40DD