Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-03 17:34:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D9AE6FFCB29CA3536DAE0A12FC9EE5B73B50F42B3E7272CBEF3690D97DF152F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN provides none of substantial evidence to dispute the claim By Citing the bureaucracy that is accused of wrong doing is not proof said bureaucracy is not complicit In illegal actions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841727197855285586
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D9AE6FFCB29CA3536DAE0A12FC9EE5B73B50F42B3E7272CBEF3690D97DF152F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1727976868843
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1841727197855285586D9AE6FFCB29CA3536DAE0A12FC9EE5B73B50F42B3E7272CBEF3690D97DF152F4