Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-03 12:42:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8C65644A301A625502ECD5D353ECB6A450FA89D0489FCD0A12F45C6A1608B8B
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN provides none of substantial evidence to dispute the claim By Citing the bureaucracy that is accused of wrong doing is not proof said bureaucracy is not complicit In illegal actions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841727197855285586
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8C65644A301A625502ECD5D353ECB6A450FA89D0489FCD0A12F45C6A1608B8B
  • createdAtMillis - 1727959355429
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1841727197855285586C8C65644A301A625502ECD5D353ECB6A450FA89D0489FCD0A12F45C6A1608B8B